Introduction
The leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, has once again challenged the Nigerian government’s terrorism charges against him. During Monday’s court session in Abuja, Kanu declined to open his defence, claiming that no valid charge exists under Nigerian law. His bold declaration sparked a heated courtroom exchange with Justice James Omotosho, who presides over the case.
Kanu Insists There Is No Valid Charge
After dismissing his team of lawyers, Kanu chose to represent himself in court. Addressing the judge directly, he said he had reviewed his case file and found no legal basis for the prosecution’s claim.
“Join me in praising God. I have gone through my case file, and there is no charge against me,” Kanu said.
“There is no law in Nigeria that supports these charges. If there is, my Lord should read it out to me.”
Kanu urged the court to either release him immediately or grant him bail, arguing that he was being detained on a fraudulent charge.
Judge Explains Legal Options Available
Justice James Omotosho interrupted Kanu to explain that, under criminal law, a defendant has specific procedural options once the prosecution closes its case.
He said a defendant may:
- File a no-case submission,
- Present a defence, or
- Rely on the prosecution’s evidence.
The judge stressed that choosing not to present a defence automatically means the defendant is relying on the prosecution’s case.
Despite the explanation, Kanu stood firm, maintaining that no legitimate charge existed and repeating his demand for release or bail on health grounds.
Prosecution Calls for Judgment
Chief Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), representing the federal government, said that since the defendant had refused to open a defence, the case should proceed to final judgment.
He argued that the court should respect its previous order, which gave Kanu six days to start and conclude his defence.
Judge Grants Kanu Seven Days to Consult Lawyer
Justice Omotosho, however, emphasized the peculiar nature of the case, noting that Kanu currently lacks legal representation. He explained that as a judge, it was his responsibility to ensure fairness for both sides.
“I must make sure the defendant understands the implications of his decision,” Omotosho said. “Since he has no legal team, I will grant him a short adjournment in the interest of justice.”
The court then granted Kanu seven additional days to consult experienced criminal lawyers before deciding whether to open his defence or maintain his current stance.
Next Hearing Scheduled
Justice Omotosho adjourned the matter to November 4, 5, and 6, giving Kanu one final opportunity to defend himself.
He warned that if the defendant still refuses to proceed, the court will move directly to final written addresses and consider Kanu as having relied solely on the prosecution’s case.
Conclusion
The courtroom standoff between Nnamdi Kanu and the Nigerian government continues to draw national attention. While Kanu insists the terrorism charges lack legal grounds, the prosecution maintains the case is ready for judgment. The coming November hearings will likely determine whether the IPOB leader finally opens his defence or faces judgment based on the prosecution’s evidence alone.
Bonus Read: South East to Get a New State as Constitution Review Committee Approves Additional State
