HEDA Resource Centre calls on Abubakar Malami to face serious corruption allegations. The group rejects his claims of bias by the EFCC. Instead, they accuse him of distracting Nigerians.
Olanrewaju Suraju, HEDA’s Chairman, signs the statement. He urges Malami to submit for investigation. This follows Malami’s demand for EFCC Chairman Ola Olukoyede to step aside.
HEDA’s Strong Rebuke
Suraju describes Malami’s bias claims as diversions. He points out vendetta and persecution accusations. These tactics avoid the main issues, Suraju argues.
Meanwhile HEDA highlights Malami’s past actions. During his tenure as Attorney General, he withheld the Justice Ayo Salami panel report. Public demands for release went unanswered.
Background on the Salami Panel
The panel investigated EFCC matters. HEDA says it targeted specific people. Ibrahim Magu resisted Malami’s interference in cases. Rotimi Oyedepo challenged prosecutorial abuses.
Additionally Ola Olukoyede opposed Malami’s asset disposal moves. A court later ruled those guidelines illegal. The panel never released its findings after removing these individuals.
Career Advances Post-Panel
Several panel invitees progressed professionally. Magu returned to the police and retired as Assistant Inspector General. Oyedepo became a Senior Advocate of Nigeria.
Furthermore he now advises President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. These outcomes suggest the panel aimed at individuals, not reforms, HEDA notes.
Allegations Against Malami
HEDA filed a 2023 petition against Malami. This led to his investigation and arrest. Charges involve corruption and office abuse.However, Malami relies on the unreleased panel to claim persecution. HEDA calls this hypocritical. They stress the report’s secrecy undermines credibility.
Call for Accountability
HEDA demands Malami stop undermining institutions. Lawful probes must proceed, they insist. Accountability trumps personal grievances. In addition, the group urges Nigerians to focus on facts. Distractions weaken anti-corruption efforts.
Lasting Implications
This case highlights tensions in Nigeria’s justice system. HEDA’s stance promotes transparency. It reminds leaders to prioritize public interest. In conclusion, Malami’s response tests EFCC’s independence. Nigerians watch closely for justice.
