Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan faces charges of criminal defamation and cyber-bullying. The case starts in 2025. It stems from her comments during a TV interview on Channels Television.
In the interview, she alleges plans to eliminate her life. Moreover she petitions the Inspector-General of Police about threats. However, authorities charge her instead.
Reasons for the Charges
Senate President Godswill Akpabio submits a petition. Former Kogi Governor Yahaya Bello also files one. They claim her statements defame them.
The Federal Government files the case in court. Additionally witnesses include Kogi Governor Usman Ododo and Reno Omokri. Therefore, the case draws national attention.
The Withdrawal Process
The government filed a Notice of Discontinuance on December 12, 2025. Officials use sections of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act. As a result, the court ends the proceedings.
The Attorney-General’s office handles the withdrawal. Yet no reasons appear in public statements. Thus, the case closes without trial.
Statements from Involved Parties
Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan maintains her innocence throughout. She criticizes the charges as misguided. Furthermore, she stays silent on the withdrawal so far. Akpabio withdrew his own defamation suits on January 1, 2026. He directed his team to end legal actions. Moreover, tensions ease between the parties.
Broader Implication
This development sparks debates on freedom of expression. Civil groups praise the move. However analysts question the initial filing.
The case highlights political rivalries in Nigeria. Moreover it shows the Attorney-General’s power to drop cases. Therefore, it sets a precedent for similar disputes.
In conclusion, the withdrawal brings relief to Akpoti-Uduaghan. Leaders now focus on national issues. Moreover unity strengthens democracy.
