The United States has introduced a new rule that allows officials to deny immigrant visas based on obesity or special-needs dependents. Many observers see this as another escalation of President Donald Trump’s hard-line immigration agenda.
Rubio Issues New Visa Directive
A diplomatic cable shows US Secretary of State Marco Rubio instructing embassies to consider “conditions such as obesity” when reviewing long-term visa applications.
The memo argues that obesity may require “expensive, long-term care,” which could burden the US public health system. It also directs consular officers to examine whether dependents have disabilities or chronic conditions that demand extensive care. Heavy care needs could prevent the main applicant from working.
KFF Health News first reported the memo, later confirmed by AFP.
Policy Applies Only to Immigrant Visa Applicants
The rule affects only long-term immigration seekers, not short-term visitors.
US law has long required officials to determine if an applicant may become a “public charge.”
Critics say Trump is using this rule more aggressively to restrict immigration.
State Department Defends the Policy
State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott said the administration must protect American taxpayers and ensure immigration does not increase public costs.
US Faces Its Own Obesity Crisis
The rule comes as the US battles high obesity rates. About 40% of Americans are obese.
Rates are even higher in many states that supported Trump.
Public health experts say the issue is linked to diet, economic pressure, and reduced access to exercise-friendly spaces.
Part of a Wider Crackdown
Trump has made immigration control a major part of his presidency.
His administration has expanded deportations, even for people with no criminal history besides immigration violations.
Marco Rubio has also supported canceling visas for individuals seen as hostile to US foreign policy, including critics of Israel.
Conclusion
The new visa rule marks a major shift in how the US evaluates immigrant applicants.
Supporters claim it protects taxpayers.
Critics argue it deepens Trump’s restrictive immigration agenda and unfairly targets vulnerable groups.
