RULAAC demanded clarity from the Tinubu administration. The group focused on the legal grounds for US airstrikes in Sokoto State.
RULAAC also raised some concerns regarding Nigerian sovereignty. They said a clear legal basis should always be provided for foreign armies to intervene. At the same time, they focused on possible violations of international law.
The Airstrikes Incident
US forces conducted airstrikes on December 25, 2025. They targeted ISWAP militants in Sokoto. Moreover AFRICOM confirmed the strikes killed multiple ISIS fighters.
Officials stated they acted in coordination with Nigerian authorities. However initial statements mentioned a request from Nigeria. Later, they removed that detail.
Government’s Position
The Federal Government acknowledged the operations. They cited intelligence cooperation with the US. Furthermore Foreign Minister Yusuf Tuggar spoke with US Secretary Marco Rubio. President Tinubu approved the strikes. Yet critics question the full legal framework. They seek details on agreements.
Broader Implications
These events raise sovereignty issues. Human rights groups worry about civilian risks. Therefore RULAAC pushes for parliamentary oversight. They aim to ensure compliance with Nigeria’s constitution.
In addition, experts note forests in Sokoto serve as militant bases. This complicates security efforts. Meanwhile President Tinubu called for peace among religions. He committed to protecting all Nigerians.
The strikes highlight ongoing counter terrorism challenges. They also spark debates on foreign involvement. RULAAC continues to advocate for accountability. The group monitors government responses closely.
