Controversial Nigerian Islamic cleric Sheikh Ahmad Gumi recently sparked widespread debate. He claimed that security sources in Abuja informed him of a plot to eliminate him alongside Boko Haram members.
This revelation came during a public address where Gumi expressed deep concerns about foreign influences in Nigeria’s security crisis.
Specifically the US allegedly marked him for elimination via an airstrike, labeling him as part of Boko Haram. Gumi questioned the caller’s words. He asked, “Who are Boko Haram?”
This highlighted his disbelief and frustration. Moreover Gumi emphasized the call’s urgency. The source warned him directly. As a result, Gumi decided to speak out publicly. He aimed to alert northern leaders and clerics.
Accusations Against the United States
Gumi directly blamed the United States for Nigeria’s insecurity. He argued that America created Boko Haram to destabilize the country. “They are the ones doing it, Boko Haram,” he declared.
Additionally he accused US President Donald Trump of worsening divisions through harmful policies. According to Gumi, these actions deepened Nigeria’s crises.
Furthermore Gumi criticized foreign backed narratives. He said they oppress citizens and falsely portray Christians as the only victims of violence. In addition, he believes the issues affect everyone. Leaders and scholars, he noted, remain silent and hide away.
Critique of Elite Inaction
Gumi accused Nigerian elites of abandoning dialogue. Instead, they leave citizens with empty noise and no solutions. “You brought us hardship, you broke us,” he stated. This inaction, he added, denies people their rights.
Moreover fear and division grow stronger. Gumi warned that such trends drag the country down. He urged immediate action to prevent further harm.
Call for Sovereignty and Unity
No sovereign nation, Gumi argued, accepts interference that divides its people. “Which country would agree to that?” he asked. Instead, nations must unite or face external control.
Therefore Gumi called for northern leaders and Islamic clerics to speak against these alleged lies. He positioned himself as a peacemaker, not a supporter of armed groups. By conducting negotiations, he thinks Nigeria can attain lasting peace.
Conclusion
The claims by Gumi bring to the fore the tensions that exist. They also demonstrate the debates that continue concerning foreign involvement in the security of the state of Nigeria.
