Trump Demands RICO Charges Against George Soros and Son

Trump’s Legal Flashpoint: Calls for George Soros & Son to Face RICO Charges

In the latest twist of his political saga, President Trump has publicly called for billionaire George Soros and his son to be charged under the stringent RICO Act, accusing them of fueling violent protests across the United States. The demand, issued via Truth Social, has ignited sharp debate—blurring lines between legal accountability and political vendetta.

What Did Trump Say? Why It Matters?

In a dramatic social media release, Trump wrote:

“George Soros, and his wonderful Radical Left son, should be charged with RICO because of their support of Violent Protests, and much more, all throughout the United States of America.”

Brushing aside nuance with sweeping rhetoric, he further labeled them “psychopaths” and warned, “Be careful, we’re watching you!”

This marks a new peak in Trump’s broader pattern of weaponizing federal authority against his critics—calling for politically charged probes into figures from John Bolton to Adam Schiff.

What the Open Society Foundations Said

The nonprofit founded by Soros swiftly and strongly denounced the move. A spokesperson called the accusations “outrageous and false”, asserting steadfast commitment to democratic values and peaceful protest.

Why This Is a Political Flashpoint

Law enforcement traditionally reserves the RICO Act for organized crime. Lawmakers did not intend it as a tool for silencing political opponents. Critics argue that this demand reeks of retribution and intimidation, not justice.

Years of unchecked conspiracy theories have painted Soros as a puppet master behind protests—most recently reignited during immigration-related demonstrations in Los Angeles. Yet, fact-checkers and independent reports have found no evidence supporting these claims.

Context: A Longstanding Target

George Soros has long been vilified in far-right circles for funding liberal causes and democratic institutions globally. His backing of anti-corruption groups, public health, and transparency efforts have only amplified his profile as a political adversary.

The Open Society Foundations continue to champion civil liberties—values Trump’s post amplified in contradiction to his rhetoric.

Wider Implications for American Governance

This public attack on a prominent philanthropic figure raises broader questions:

1. Are authorities criminalizing political dissent?
2. Could future administrations weaponize law enforcement against ideological opponents?
3. What does this mean for civil society groups operating under political scrutiny?

Notably, Trump’s statements follow the DOJ and other federal actions against perceived internal critics—a trend fueling concerns about the erosion of democratic norms.

Bottom Line

Trump’s move to charge Soros and his son under RICO—absent evidence—looks less like a legitimate legal call and more like political theater. It’s a clarion call for all stakeholders to stay vigilant: as power shifts, our democratic guardrails must stay firmly in place.