President Donald Trump signs a memorandum that directs the United States to withdraw from 66 international organizations. This action happens on January 7, 2026. Officials state these groups no longer serve American interests.
The move affects both United Nations entities and other global bodies. Additionally, it follows a State Department review under Executive Order 14199.
Presidential Memorandum Details
Trump issues the directive to cease US participation and funding in these organizations. The memorandum lists 35 non-UN organizations and 31 UN-affiliated entities.
Departments and agencies must implement the withdrawals as soon as possible. However, they follow legal guidelines and budget rules.
Causes of Withdrawal
According to the administration, these entities squander funds and undermine US sovereignty. The America First strategy is at the center of Trump’s plans. He seeks to halt financial support for globalization.
Those who support this move admire it for its ability to promote efficiency. Others who oppose it, believe it is a move to isolate America from the rest of the world.
Affected Organizations
The list includes bodies on climate, human rights, and development. For example, the US exits the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. Other withdrawals target the Green Climate Fund and various UN agencies. Furthermore, non-UN groups like certain trade and health entities face cuts.
International Responses
Int’l leaders show concerns about this US withdrawal. Environmental organizations regard it as a setback to global efforts. Right wing leaders appreciate this action for repelling government overreach. Social networks are active on split views from fans and opponents.
Impact on US Foreign Policy
This shift prioritizes bilateral deals over multilateral ties. Experts predict vacuums that other nations might fill. The US saves funds but loses influence in global forums. Nevertheless, the administration vows to continue reviews of more organizations.
Conclusion
Trump’s order marks a bold change in US engagement worldwide. It fulfills campaign promises but sparks debate. In the end, the long-term effects remain uncertain as allies adjust.
