President Donald Trump sparks global debate with his recent comments on Greenland. He insists the United States must control the island to block Russia and China. This move revives his 2019 interest in buying the territory from Denmark.
Trump’s Firm Stance
Trump declares the US will secure Greenland through a deal or by force. He tells reporters aboard Air Force One that countries defend ownership, not leases. Additionally he warns that Russia or China will seize it if America fails to act. Trump mocks Greenland’s defenses as weak and stresses national security needs.
He repeats this message in meetings with oil executives. Trump claims Russian and Chinese ships surround the island. However Denmark rejects these claims and demands evidence.
Greenland’s Strategic Value
Greenland holds vast mineral resources and a key Arctic position. The US already operates Thule Air Base there under a 1951 treaty. Trump argues this setup falls short against rising threats from rivals.
Vice President JD Vance supports this view. He criticizes Denmark for underinvesting in defenses, leaving the island vulnerable. Meanwhile allies like Mike Waltz highlight access to natural resources as crucial.
Strong Pushback from Denmark and Greenland
Denmark’s leaders firmly oppose Trump’s threats. Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warns that a US takeover ends NATO. Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen disputes claims of foreign ships and calls for dialogue.
Greenland’s officials echo this rejection. Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen states residents want independence as Greenlanders, not Americans. Party leaders unite against any annexation.
Broader International Reactions
Europe expresses alarm over Trump’s rhetoric. French President Emmanuel Macron cannot imagine US violation of Danish sovereignty. NATO leaders urge calm to preserve the alliance.
Russia and China stay silent, but experts note Trump’s claims lack proof. Critics fear this strains US alliances and risks conflict. Supporters on platforms like X praise Trump’s proactive approach.
Possible Outcomes and Implications
Trump sends envoys like Jeff Landry to negotiate. However Denmark refuses to accredit them. Options range from financial incentives to military action, though the latter invites global backlash.
This dispute tests NATO’s unity. It also highlights Arctic competition as climate change opens new routes. Trump pushes forward, but opposition grows strong. The world watches closely for the next steps.
