A prosecution witness testified before a Lagos State Special Offences Court. He stated that social media influencer Blessing Nkiruka Okoro lied about property ownership.
The witness, Dr. Onuoha Okeigwe, spoke before Justice Rahman Oshodi in Ikeja. He explained that he paid N69.15 million for a five-year building lease.
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission arraigned Blessing CEO. She faces a two-count charge of obtaining money by false pretence.
Court filings show the defendant induced Hope Chiropractic Health Clinic Limited to pay the funds. The disputed property is located in Lekki.
Consequently, this high-profile fraud trial has drawn intense public scrutiny. Observers closely follow digital influence and real estate transactions.
Witness Details Transaction and False Representations
During cross-examination by defense counsel, Okeigwe defended his financial transactions. He relied heavily on physical meetings and digital messages.
Lease Agreement: The witness stated the defendant presented herself as the rightful owner. She collected funds covering lease, agency, and legal fees.
Renovation Costs: Okeigwe filed a separate civil suit. He seeks to recover over N100 million spent renovating the facility.
Double Leasing: Investigators revealed the defendant allegedly leased the exact property to multiple parties.
Furthermore, prosecutors submitted WhatsApp chats and corporate documents as exhibits. These items substantiate the charges against the defendant.
Ongoing Legal Proceedings and Court Adjournment
Turning to court proceedings, Blessing CEO pleaded not guilty. She denied all charges brought by the anti-graft agency.
Justice Oshodi adjourned the matter to January 12, 2027. The prosecution will present additional witnesses when the trial resumes.
“Every piece of documentary evidence undergoes strict judicial scrutiny,” legal experts noted.
Meanwhile, social media commentators debate the broader implications of the case. Court hearings continue to capture public interest.
Finally, defense lawyers will continue cross-examining witnesses next year. The legal battle remains active