Popular Nigerian Christian TikTok creator Audrey Cyril has been caught in an online relationship controversy. Cyril has over 600,000 followers and often shares faith-based content. She previously kept her partner away from the public eye. She also spoke about saving her virginity for the man she would marry.
In July, her fiancé, Mr Presh, proposed to her after reconnecting with her. He reportedly said they had lost contact for about 10 years before he reached out again. Wedding plans reportedly followed the proposal.
Oma shares her experiences with Audrey’s fiancé
However, the engagement soon attracted attention for another reason. A woman identified as Oma publicly shared her alleged experience with Mr Presh. She claimed they had been seeing each other and communicating for some time. According to her, they enjoyed staycations and remained in contact until January.
Oma said she later discovered that Mr Presh had been dating Audrey for about two years. She also alleged that she cooked for him whenever he visited. At the time, she said she believed they were in a relationship.
Several other women chip in their part of the story
Following Oma’s claims, other women reportedly came forward with similar stories. One woman alleged that Mr Presh took her on several dates and told her he was single. She said they had movie nights and spent time together before she discovered his engagement.
Another woman claimed he later deactivated his WhatsApp account. Others shared photos and videos of themselves with him. Some images reportedly showed the women inside his car and home. One woman also claimed she had known him for three years and received money from him during their interactions.
The allegations have continued to spark reactions across social media. One woman recalled her alleged experience, saying:
“We were on a staycation when I found out he cheated on me. We broke up in January.”
She also claimed that Mr Presh “has a type” and often sends women money.
Meanwhile, Audrey Cyril and Mr Presh had not publicly addressed the allegations at the time of publication. The claims remain allegations and have not been independently verified.
